Paul Jellinek
Where'd You Go BernadettePaul Jellinek is an architect and professor of architecture, and one of the most important witnesses to Bernadette Fox’s life as a creator. Their friendship is not presented as constant intimacy: Paul himself says they did not speak all that much. Its importance lies instead in the moments when he recognized what Bernadette’s family could not, and in his efforts to preserve both her work and her capacity to make it.
Identity and Early Connection
Paul enters Bernadette’s history through the architectural world of Los Angeles. He is identified as an architect and professor, associated in the dossier with both SCI-Arc and USC. At a dinner party after Bernadette and Elgin Branch bought the former Beeber Bifocal factory, Paul met the couple alongside contractor David Walker. The purchase had just closed, and Bernadette’s excitement about the factory animated the gathering. She spoke of the old machinery and boxes of bifocals still inside and of doing something with them. Paul later recalled that her manner seemed wild and imprecise; he had not yet understood that she was a trained architect or a favored figure of Michael Graves.
That first impression captures a tension in Paul’s perspective. He was not an intimate confidant who knew every stage of Bernadette’s life; he encountered her through the work, and his understanding grew through specific episodes. But he could recognize an artistic energy that others might mistake for impracticality. When Bernadette and Elgin later built Twenty Mile House, Paul became both a professional witness to the project and a friend drawn into the consequences of its loss.
The Twenty Mile House and Its Demolition
Paul’s relationship with Twenty Mile House was practical as well as personal. He had a key and sometimes brought students to see the house. On one visit, while Bernadette was in Europe, he turned off Mulholland and found the gate open. Three bulldozers were demolishing the building, breaking apart its walls, windows, beams, furniture, lights, and cabinets. Paul did not know Bernadette had sold the property, and he had not been told that demolition was underway.
He tried to stop the destruction directly, approaching a bulldozer and pulling its operator down to demand an explanation. When that failed, he organized his students into a line in front of the machines, then drove to a pay phone on Hollywood Boulevard. With no cell phones available, he called Bernadette’s home and left an angry message on her answering machine, asking why she had not told him and protesting that she could not go to Europe and destroy the house without warning him. His response reflects the scale of his attachment to the building, but also the limits of his knowledge: he was acting on what he saw, without knowing that Bernadette had already sold it.
Paul was away from his office when Bernadette returned and called back. In her message, she asked what he was talking about and said they were home. She then contacted her realtor, whose explanation revealed that Bernadette had not known what had happened to the property after the sale. Paul’s intervention could not save the house, but the episode made him a witness to its destruction and to the painful gap between the building’s meaning for Bernadette and the transaction that had placed it beyond her control.
Friendship, Memory, and Bernadette’s Creative Life
Years later, Bernadette recalled a place on La Brea near Twenty Mile House where she and Paul could meet, eat rosewater ice cream, and use the phone. In a message to him, she expressed a wish for him to meet Bee Branch. The recollection places their friendship within ordinary routines as well as architecture: meetings, a neighborhood establishment, and the effort to connect Paul with her daughter. It also shows that Bernadette still regarded him as someone she wanted in her family’s orbit, even though their contact had not always been close.
Paul’s clearest intervention comes in a brief letter dated December 14. He challenges Bernadette’s account of her circumstances and urges her to create, warning that without creative work she would become a menace to society. The force of the message depends on how directly it names what he sees as the central problem: Bernadette has stopped making things. His appeal is not a medical diagnosis or a plan for treatment. It is the judgment of an architect and longtime observer who understands creation as necessary to her identity.
Elgin later confirms how significant Paul’s understanding was. During the family crisis, Elgin complains that Bernadette has confided in an architect she had not seen for twenty years rather than bringing her fears to her husband. Later, after Bee’s search has brought the family’s history into view, Elgin calls Paul a true friend who knew Bernadette best and understood that she needed to create. He also acknowledges his own failure to help her return to that work. Paul’s insight thus becomes part of Elgin’s reckoning with the marriage, even though Paul’s relationship with Bernadette had been intermittent.
Narrative Role and Significance
Paul’s character is assembled through testimony, remembered scenes, and correspondence rather than through sustained scenes of his own. His account of the bulldozers establishes his care for Twenty Mile House; Bernadette’s recollection of their meetings preserves a more intimate, everyday connection; and his letter gives direct shape to his belief that creative work is essential to her. These sources show distinct sides of the friendship without making it effortless or all-knowing.
His importance also lies in the contrast between recognition and intervention. Paul sees that Bernadette’s creative life cannot be dismissed as a youthful phase or an old professional grievance. He can name the danger of its absence, and his words remain with her family after she is missing. Yet he does not control the circumstances that have left her isolated, nor can his earlier attempt to defend the house undo its destruction. By the time Elgin understands the force of Paul’s warning, it has become a measure of what the family failed to see. Paul therefore serves as a partial but consequential witness: someone whose professional knowledge and friendship allow him to recognize the artist in Bernadette, even when those closest to her have lost sight of that part of her.


